been looking deeper into @grvt_io lately, especially how its architecture could impact liquidity. one thing that caught my attention is the relationship between speed, privacy, and trust. a few things stood out: >self-custody matters. traders have more control over their funds, while ZK proofs help verify settlement. >privacy matters too. market makers don't necessarily want their positions and strategies exposed on a public chain. >execution speed is another interesting part. Grvt reports up to 600k TPS with sub-2ms latency. what looks promising is how these pieces work together. but there's one thing i don't want to overlook. high TPS doesn't automatically mean deep liquidity. you still need active traders, competitive market makers, and enough real order flow. that's probably the bigger challenge. i also think it's easy to focus too much on performance numbers and overlook actual market depth. the architecture looks interesting, but i'm still curious to see how consistently it translates into real liquidity and trading activity. still watching how this develops.