The more I explore quantum security, the more I realise that choosing strong cryptography today isn’t enough. Blockchains also need a way to evolve when existing security assumptions start changing. That’s one aspect of @Starknet I find particularly interesting. Its STARK proofs are built on hash based cryptographic foundations, while programmable accounts give developers room to experiment with alternative signature schemes. But there’s more to consider than the cryptography itself. Wallet compatibility, existing smart contracts and Starknet’s reliance on Ethereum all bring additional challenges. I think this is where the conversation around quantum readiness needs more attention. It’s not about claiming that every part of a network is already protected against quantum threats. It’s about understanding which components may become vulnerable and having a practical strategy for upgrading them. For me, adaptability is becoming just as important as the security technology a blockchain uses right now. A network that can evolve its protections without disrupting its entire ecosystem could have a meaningful advantage in the long run. More on Starknet’s research: https://t.co/qLZHtbRjDd