a high Zaps ranking doesn't mean you're equally valuable to every Activity Market. that's a subtle distinction in @zerufinance's design. the Hall of Fame recognizes broader onchain participation, with the top 500 positioned for Zerus freemint whitelist access. but zETH mining evaluates Ethereum-specific activity, with separate eligibility requirements. same reputation infrastructure. different definitions of contribution. this matters because someone active across ten chains may rank highly overall without being a leading contributor to Ethereum. the challenge is preventing global reputation from overriding the economic relevance of each market. to me, ZeruAI's strongest design opportunity is making reputation portable while keeping rewards context-specific. a universal score should provide context, not replace evidence. connect your real wallets, check your Zaps and compare your Hall of Fame standing with your zETH eligibility.