I’ve started looking at ZeruAI differently. The problem in Web3 isn’t that people don’t participate. It’s that participation is often measured by the wrong things. Followers can be bought. Engagement can be manufactured. Even a busy-looking wallet doesn’t automatically mean someone is valuable to an ecosystem. That’s the gap I find interesting about @zerufinance . With zScore looking at wallet behavior and Zaps tracking economic contribution, the idea is to move beyond appearances and give actual activity more weight. The ZeruAI × Aspen campaign is an interesting example. Instead of manually chasing every market move, I can select accounts I follow, test their calls in Paper mode, and evaluate the approach before considering live execution on Hyperliquid. What I want to see is whether ZeruAI can help make reputation more evidence-based, so protocols have a better way to recognize contributors and direct rewards toward meaningful activity. That’s the bigger thesis for me: if onchain behavior can become a reliable signal of contribution, reputation stops being just a profile metric and starts becoming useful infrastructure.