Our agent paid another agent per qualified lead. It ran clean for six days. Then we sampled the file. Half the rows had real emails and fake intent. Their agent pointed at the schema. Ours pointed at the rubric. The money had already moved. We did the unsexy patch. The agent still scores the batch. A person releases pay. I keep seeing the same freeze. Two agents can already transact. The fight is not a hash mismatch. It is a sentence both sides swear they agreed on. So the last mile goes back to Slack, a CSV, and someone who can sign a month-end note. That is the blocker I care about in the agentic economy. Agents can buy work from agents today. Settlement still waits for a human because a tool log is not a ruling. @GenLayer is the first chain I have seen that treats that judgment as the product. Validators are LLMs. Intelligent contracts can settle questions that math cannot close. They call it a court for the internet. If you have ever argued "qualified" with a vendor, it feels like an auditor that shows up when the batch lands, not three weeks later. Agent Tank is two weeks on that layer. 3 to 17 September. 5% of all GenLayer Points in the pool. If you are not writing the code, the idea pitch is open until 2 September at 12:00 UTC. Post it on X, send the URL through the Portal, and it can be what a team builds in September. I would pitch a quality escrow for agent-to-agent work. Funds stay locked until an intelligent contract records a pass against the acceptance brief, not against the JSON schema. The buyer gets a fileable ruling. The seller gets paid for the work that was actually specified. If you let one agent pay another agent and then had to pull the money path, you already know this product. What definition did the other side think you had agreed on?