As AI agents become capable of making payments on our behalf, wallets like @MetaMask become a foundational part of agentic commerce. They enable agents to securely hold assets, authorize transactions, and interact with onchain applications without giving up user custody. But moving money is only one part of a commercial transaction. What happens if an agent pays for a service that doesn't meet the agreed terms? What if a deliverable is late, incomplete, or violates the contract? A wallet can execute the payment, but it can't determine whether a commitment was fulfilled. That's where Metamask would need a dispute layer. Internet Court by @GenLayer fills that gap by giving agents a structured way to handle disagreements. It connects contracts, evidence, adjudication, and outcomes so that disputed transactions don't simply fall apart. Instead, they can lead to revisions, refunds, escrow decisions, or reputation updates based on what the agreement actually required. MetaMask enables agents to transact, @courtofinternet enables those transactions to remain accountable.