Since you asked for my feedback here it is - Great diversification. But I'd push back on a few things. 20+ holdings means nothing moves the needle. $META is the biggest position at 9%. Even a 30% gain on your best stock barely registers on the overall portfolio. That's the hidden cost of over-diversification. You're diversified away from your own best ideas. Worth asking about every stock on this list. Can the world function without this company? $META. $MA. $MSFT. $AMZN. $SPGI. The world stops without those. $VICI. $NEE. $REXR. $ELF. $NOV. Do they really belong alongside those names? Are they genuine convictions or just filling a slot? More holdings doesn't automatically mean better risk-adjusted returns. Have you calculated your blended Sharpe ratio? It often means worse ones. Diluted conviction. Diluted performance. I went from 26 holdings to 9. My returns nearly doubled. Not saying copy that. But it's worth doing the maths on what your top 5-7 stocks would return on their own versus the full 20+. The answer might surprise you. How many stocks do you actually have conviction in? This is just my methodology and may not suit everyone. What works for me may not work for you, just my feedback - All the best!