Lots of investors have the same problem as @TMtheOG here Can’t find a project that invest 100% of their revenue back into the coin It’s probably the most bullish signal of a true blue chip $DOT @usedotai is on its way to mastering this & @stagedhappen has fixed this problem 100% of the revenue goes back into $DOT It’s one of the main reasons I keep accumulating more $DOT is becoming more scarce Why & How? Let’s look Revenue sources: • Subscriptions (Pro ~$12/mo, ProX ~$63/mo, Max ~$119/mo; paid in USDC or $DOT): Higher-tier DotChat/DotCode access, shared usage pools, and included private credits (non-expiring). Recent snapshots showed ~$3.8k–$4k subscription MRR (dozens of paid plans) as a floor. • Direct credit purchases / top-ups / pay-as-you-go: Private encrypted credit vaults funded on-chain (USDC or $DOT). Credits power chat/tokens, images (typically 1 credit/image), video clips, code, API calls, agents, and MCP actions. • API / developer tier and private deployments. • Paying in $DOT gives bonuses (e.g., +10% more credits or +250 free credits in some flows) and can unlock discounted plan pricing vs USDC. Revenue is from actual AI tooling spend (not user data). Subscription MRR is a floor; usage/API adds more. Closing the loop / reinvestment back into the project: • Reduced supply + stronger token economics support continued development, competitive (often lower) pricing, infrastructure, and open-source efforts. • Stronger/scarcer $DOT + payment bonuses encourage more users to pay in $DOT and use the platform → more usage → more revenue → more buybacks/burns. • Direct $DOT payments for credits/inference can trigger architectural/mechanical burns (Phase 1: 100% of such credits burned, executed periodically on-chain). Every prompt/MCP/agent action paid this way contributes to burns. This model is FULLY actuated and working for $DOT @usedotai