If you only look at the partner logo list to assess @axisrobotics, it’s easy to be misled. What I care about more: which logos have been publicly confirmed by Axis on X, and which are only listed in their documentation. ☆ The clearest case: Booster Robotics On 08/06/2026, @axisrobotics announced a commercial partnership with Booster Robotics. The stated collaboration includes sim-to-real joint training and physical embodiment cooperation. This isn’t just a “logo-for-aesthetics” relationship. This is a partnership directly published by Axis themselves. ☆ A more recent signal On 10/07/2026, Axis mentioned they brought two K1 robots from @boosterobotics to @wallet’s live event. More importantly, Axis referred to Booster as “one of our key embodiment partners.” To me, this is a signal worth tracking—it directly connects to real-world robotics, not just停留在 dashboard-level interactions. ☆ Another confirmed partner Besides Booster, @FeagineRobotics was also publicly announced by Axis as a commercial partner on 09/17/2026. Therefore, when discussing hardware/embodiment partnerships officially confirmed by Axis on X, only Booster Robotics and Feagine Robotics should be singled out. ☆ What about the logos in the docs? The docs / partners page under “Working with” lists AgiBot, Zeroth, Deep Robotics, EngineAI, and Unitree. But so far, Axis has not posted on X confirming any of these names as hardware/embodiment partners in the same way they did with Booster. This distinction matters. Just seeing a logo in the docs doesn’t mean it’s equivalent to a confirmed partnership. My thesis is simpler: Axis is trying to build a data engine for Physical AI. For the data layer to have real-world value, it needs a direct pathway into physical robots. That’s why confirmed partnerships like Booster Robotics and Feagine Robotics are far more worth tracking than simply counting logos. Robotics that stay confined to dashboards aren’t enough. But bullish positions should be based on confirmed signals—not over-extrapolating from documentation. Which type of project would you prioritize? Confirmed hardware distribution, or software traction alone sufficient for early investment?