COLDCARD'S SECURITY REVIEWS ARE NOW GETTING A SECURITY REVIEW. 🤖🔎 @nvk says at least 15 external review or research efforts touched Coldcard before its seed-generation defect emerged, and credits a new AI model with finding what humans missed. @LukeDashjr disputes that defense and has published concerns he says he previously shared privately. Crucially, he does NOT claim every concern is a confirmed bug or exploitable. @validatedcode argues that ongoing QA is different from reviewing an entire codebase. @jamesob's earlier account of warnings has also resurfaced; those remain his account, not a finding of deliberate neglect. The roughly $116M loss estimate concerns the earlier incident, not a new theft tonight. The question: what does a stack of review stamps actually prove?
Leader AlphaShare
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.