the real test of quantum security is what happens when you look beyond the marketing. @Americanfort_io is taking a technical approach with QBIP-32, exploring quantum-safe key derivation across different curves alongside NIST-standardized signature schemes. another part worth examining is ZKPoSP, which explores how a wallet can prove the provenance of its seed without disclosing the seed itself. the research is available on the IACR ePrint archive as 2026/1508, giving people something concrete to examine rather than relying on a headline about quantum resistance. but published research and proven security are two different things. the cryptographic design, implementation quality, testing process and underlying assumptions all matter when evaluating whether a system can withstand real attacks. even post-quantum cryptography comes with trade-offs and limitations, so calling something quantum-resistant shouldn't be the end of the discussion. i'd rather see exactly which threats @Americanfort_io is designed to address, what evidence supports those claims and what risks still need to be considered. that's how i'd evaluate any serious attempt to build more resilient crypto infrastructure.