Good evening fam 🫶 A trader can be profitable and still have a terrible risk profile. That is one of the reasons I find the way @agenticscredit looks at drawdown interesting. PnL alone can hide a lot. Someone can finish a period in profit, post the final number, and make the strategy look great. But that screenshot does not show what happened on the way there. How deep was the account underwater before recovering? How much risk was taken to generate that return? Was the trader consistently in control, or did one lucky recovery save an otherwise terrible sequence? Those questions matter much more to me than simply seeing a green number at the end. And that is why having drawdown as an important part of ACS makes sense. I would rather see a strategy make slightly less while keeping risk controlled than watch something produce a huge return after repeatedly putting the entire account in danger. Because eventually, surviving the path matters. This also changes how I want to approach my own experiments inside Agentics Credit. I am not only going to watch whether a trade wins or loses. I want to watch what happens between entry and exit. How far does the position move against me? How much volatility am I accepting? Am I taking unnecessary risk because I am too focused on the final PnL? And when I change those behaviors, does my ACS start reflecting it? That is the part I want to understand through actual usage. A profitable trade can still be a bad trade. A losing trade can sometimes come from a perfectly reasonable process. The final result only tells part of the story. For me, the more interesting question is how the account survived the journey to that result. That is what I will be paying attention to as my trading record gets longer.