Most reputation systems have one weakness that is easy to overlook. They treat reputation like a snapshot. You prove what you have done, get a score, qualify for something, and that reputation becomes almost static. But real reputation does not work that way. Your actions after qualification should still matter, whether you keep contributing, helping others, bringing new users, or simply disappearing. That is what makes @NucleusCodes interesting to me: eligibility is connected to onchain and social activity, but reputation can continue evolving through contribution. The important shift is from “what did you do?” to “what are you still doing?” That makes reputation feel less like a badge and more like a living record.