The biggest problem with cross-border payments may not be speed. It’s how many separate systems have to agree before money actually settles. Traditional correspondent banking can route value through multiple intermediaries, ledgers, operating hours, and reconciliation processes. Bitcoin takes a different approach: a shared global network can serve as the settlement foundation itself. For @utexocom , the interesting part is what happens when USDT enters that stack: Bitcoin → settlement foundation RGB → asset layer Lightning → fast payment rail Utexo → infrastructure connecting them The thesis isn’t “replace every bank.” It’s simpler: reduce how much infrastructure has to sit between sender and receiver. If payments can coordinate around a shared settlement layer instead of a chain of institutional relationships, cross-border finance starts looking fundamentally different. The real question is how much intermediary infrastructure we actually need.
zing | rialo.ioShare

Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.