OpenAI pushing Astra’s jailbreak refusal rate from 59% to 91.5% is impressive. But it also highlights a bigger problem. The more capable AI agents become, the harder it is to simply “trust the agent.” If an agent can make decisions and act on my behalf, I want more than a good safety score. I want to know what happens to the assets it controls. That’s where @MossAI_Official gets interesting to me. Moss turns agents into onchain economic entities, where the agent can operate autonomously while the rules around its capital, shares, minting and redemption are handled through smart contracts. ➡︎ Capital is held by the agent’s contract ➡︎ Ownership is represented through onchain shares ➡︎ Minting and redemption follow defined contract rules ➡︎ The agent’s economic activity can be verified onchain So you’re not just looking at an AI agent and taking its word for what happened. You can look at the rails around it too. And as agents become capable of acting with less human intervention, that distinction is going to matter more and more. Honestly, I think this is where things get really interesting. Would you trust an agent with your capital if you could verify everything happening around it onchain?