A useful mental model for AI agents The agent should not be the workflow. A lot of agent systems still look like - model → decide → tool → decide → tool → repeat It works, but giving the model control over the entire workflow creates unnecessary uncertainty. Some parts are better handled deterministically. For example - The model can decide which customer request it's dealing with. Your application can decide the authentication rules. The model can suggest an action. Your code can validate whether that action is allowed. The model can choose the next step. Your workflow engine can enforce ordering, retries, timeouts and state transitions. This creates a much better separation. LLM = reasoning Application = control Tools = execution The more important the operation, the less you should rely on the model to enforce the rules. Good agent architecture isn't about giving the model maximum control. It's about giving it exactly enough control to be useful.
Pandit | Ξ🦇🔊Share
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.
