You don't need a new blockchain every time the threat model changes. @quipnetwork is taking a different approach: embedding the security layer directly into the wallets and workflows users are already using—on existing chains. Migrating an entire ecosystem is simply not feasible. Moving an entire ecosystem is a massive undertaking involving new wallets, new infrastructure, new habits, and fragmented payment processes. Changing cryptography is difficult, but it is still easier than forcing everyone to start over from scratch. They view the post-quantum challenge through the lens of adoption: if robust security requires users to rebuild their entire setup, who would actually use it? Users want better protection, not to be forced to start from square one. The software engineering challenges remain, but the practical side is even harder: how do you upgrade security without the upgrade itself becoming a barrier? The tracking figures are accurate.