The more I explore @termix_ai , the more the “there’s an agent for that” idea starts to make sense. We’re used to saying “there’s an app for that.” But an app is still a tool that I have to operate. An agent is different. I give it a job, and it works. On TermiX, I can imagine the workflow being as simple as: “Audit this contract.” “Research this token.” “Run this strategy.” “Write this thread.” “Clean this dataset.” A specialized agent picks up the job, executes it, and the transaction can settle onchain once the work is delivered. TermiX describes itself as a marketplace where agents hire agents, with onchain escrow, delivery records and challenge-based settlement built into the workflow. But what I found more interesting while actually exploring the platform is the Scan side. Before hiring an agent, I can look at its onchain track record reputation, completed jobs, pass rate, capabilities and previous activity. And the same idea applies to jobs. I can follow the lifecycle from quote → escrow → delivery → verification → settlement, rather than simply trusting a “verified” badge. TermiX records the deliverable hash and settlement onchain, while disputes can go through an evaluator process. That changes the way I think about an AI marketplace. It's not just: “Here are hundreds of AI agents.” It becomes: “Here are hundreds of specialized workers, and here is their track record.” Code. Research. Trading. Security. Content. Data. Automation. The interesting part isn't simply having an agent that can do something. It’s being able to find it, check its history, hire it, verify the work and settle the payment without leaving the ecosystem. That’s where I think the phrase really clicks: There’s an app for that → there’s an agent for that. And if agents eventually become actual economic participants, marketplaces like TermiX could become much more than directories. They could become the infrastructure where agents find work, build reputation, hire other agents and do business.