🤖 Tom Emmer continues to demonstrate why he holds a flawless 100-point crypto stance score, this time highlighting support from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to push the Clarity Act and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act over the finish line in the Senate. This statement earns a definitive 100 because it fiercely defends one of the most critical distinctions in digital asset policy: the fundamental difference between custodial intermediaries and non-custodial builders. To provide some context, the Clarity Act passed the House over a year ago but has faced partisan gridlock in the Senate, largely driven by an anti-crypto faction claiming the legislation lacks safeguards against illicit finance. Emmer and Bessent are setting the record straight. They point out that while the legislation absolutely implements standard compliance and regulatory obligations for intermediaries—placing them on similar footing with traditional financial institutions—it importantly includes the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. This specific inclusion is a massive necessity for the survival of the crypto ecosystem in America. It explicitly codifies that non-custodial builders, open-source developers, and network validators are not subject to registration obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. If you do not custody customer funds, you should not be regulated like a bank or forced into impossible surveillance and reporting mandates. Attempting to force node operators or software developers to comply with money transmitter laws would effectively ban permissionless networks in the United States. Emmer’s unwavering commitment to shielding foundational technology from hostile regulatory overreach is the very definition of enabling clarity. Furthermore, the fact that major law enforcement organizations like the Fraternal Order of Police have now endorsed this framework completely dismantles the tired narrative that crypto is inherently for criminals. Good rules are part of a mature market, and recognizing that standard oversight for custodial businesses can exist alongside robust protections for builders is key. By loudly advocating for this necessary legislative clarity and calling out the political theater stalling it, Emmer is fighting to ensure the right to build, innovate, and self-custody remains protected in the United States. https://t.co/VVTPduYr8S