Most founders think security is just securing the smart contract. But here are some common myths vs. reality that every founder needs to understand. > Myth: Once we've passed an audit, we're secure. Reality: According to me, this is one of the biggest misconceptions in Web3. An audit isn't a certificate of security it's a review of your code at a specific point in time. The moment you ship a new feature, integrate another protocol, update an oracle, or change your backend infrastructure, your risk profile changes. An audit helps reduce risk, but every update after that deserves the same level of attention. > Myth: Hackers only exploit smart contracts. Reality: I don't think that's true anymore. What we've seen over the last couple of years is that some of the biggest losses haven't come from Solidity bugs they've come from compromised private keys, phishing, access control failures, backend infrastructure, oracle signers, and operational mistakes. Your frontend, APIs, deployment pipeline, wallets, and infrastructure are all part of your attack surface. In my opinion, founders need to think beyond the smart contract. Your infrastructure, keys, and operational processes matter just as much. > Myth: We're too small to be a target. Reality: Attackers don't usually care how many followers your project has. They care about one thing whether they can extract value. If your protocol holds assets or has users, you're already interesting to someone. Waiting until you're big enough to invest in security is often too late. > Myth: One trusted signer or admin key is enough. Reality: In my opinion, every privileged key should be treated like your treasury. Oracle keys, deployment keys, upgrade keys, multisig signers, backend credentials every one of them can become a single point of failure. One compromised credential can put an entire protocol at risk. > Myth: We'll improve security after launch. Reality: Attackers won't wait till that point. Founders often think security can be added in later iterations. Unfortunately, exploits don't follow product timelines. The best time to build monitoring, incident response, and operational security is before users trust you with their assets. > Myth: Internal testing is enough. Reality: Your team knows how the protocol is supposed to work. An external researcher thinks about how it can fail. That's why audits, competitive reviews, bug bounties, and continuous testing all play different roles. Security benefits from fresh perspectives. > Myth: Open source means someone will find the bugs. Reality: Open source improves transparency. It doesn't guarantee someone will review every line of code or responsibly disclose every vulnerability. Publishing code is not the same as validating it. > Myth: Security is the auditor's responsibility. Reality: This is probably the biggest mindset shift founders need to make. Auditors help reduce risk. But security is built by everyone founders making product decisions, developers writing code, DevOps teams managing infrastructure, and operations teams protecting access. I've always believed that security isn't something you finish it's something you continuously improve. Final Takeaway: The security landscape has changed. And I believe our mindset towards security needs to change with it. It's no longer enough to focus only on smart contracts. As founders, we need to think about securing the entire protocol from contracts and infrastructure to keys, access controls, and every system that keeps the protocol running.
Preetam | QuillAudits 🥷Share
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.