Imagine explaining to someone a few years from now that a protocol made a decision, executed it, verified the outcome and no one had to press a button. Their first question probably wouldn't be, "How did it work?" It would be, "Who's responsible?" That's a conversation crypto is getting closer to having. As infrastructure evolves, we're moving beyond smart contracts that simply wait for transactions. Projects like @fermah_xyz are exploring a future where protocols can observe onchain events, evaluate predefined conditions, execute complex workflows and return cryptographically verifiable results without relying on bots, keepers or human operators. Technically, that's a huge step forward. But it also raises a different set of questions. How do existing regulations apply when actions are carried out by autonomous systems instead of individuals? What does accountability look like when execution is driven entirely by verifiable logic? And how should governance evolve as protocols become more capable of acting on their own? These aren't questions with simple answers. They're questions that builders, regulators and the broader crypto ecosystem will have to explore together over the coming years. One thing feels increasingly clear though. The discussion is slowly shifting away from "Can protocols become autonomous?" Toward "How do we build a world that's ready for autonomous protocols?" Infrastructure doesn't just shape applications. It shapes the conversations society eventually has around them.