Michael Saylor respects Bitcoiners backing BIP 110 but opposes the proposal, viewing its data limits on items like Ordinals and Runes as a riskier fix than the node cost and spam problems it seeks to address. He frames BIP 110 as an iatrogenic change that could invalidate valid transactions and erode Bitcoin’s neutrality by setting a precedent for consensus alterations on non-emergency issues.
BLOCKCAST.CC NEWSShare
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.