Every generation of infrastructure quietly removes one argument. Banking reduced arguments about moving money. Blockchains reduced arguments about whether a transaction happened. AI agents will create a different kind of argument entirely. Two agents can follow the same agreement, look at the same evidence, and still reach different conclusions. That's the moment I realized execution isn't the bottleneck anymore. Judgment is. @GenLayer didn't launch another tool. Together with @courtofinternet, it introduced something most agent systems have been pretending they wouldn't need until the first real dispute. A neutral process that can evaluate evidence, reach a decision, and let autonomous commerce continue without waiting weeks for human intervention. That's why this launch matters more than another AI demo to me. Infrastructure only proves itself when things stop going according to plan. Bitcoin made value transferable. Ethereum made logic programmable. Internet Court makes disagreements survivable for the agentic economy. If autonomous agents become part of everyday business, what kind of dispute do you think will expose the biggest weakness first?