One assumption I keep seeing is that better AI agents automatically mean better AI transactions. I don't think that's true. A brilliant agent can still end up in a bad deal if every protocol involved understands the agreement a little differently. Reading the @InternetCourt launch made me realize something. The next bottleneck probably isn't intelligence. It's coordination. Identity, negotiation, payment, escrow, execution, verification, and disputes already have builders pushing each layer forward. The missing piece is making those layers participate in the same contract flow instead of behaving like isolated checkpoints. That's what makes Internet Court interesting to me. Not because it replaces the stack, but because it gives existing protocols an open skill for agent contract pipelines that lets two agents complete an entire deal in natural language from start to finish. We'll probably know agent commerce has gone mainstream when people stop asking which protocol handled a transaction and start assuming the whole process simply worked. What do you think will slow mass adoption more over the next few years: smarter agents arriving too slowly, or trustworthy coordination between agents taking longer than expected? Why?