Hey CT! Please, I need some MicroStrategy experts to help me with my concerns 👇 In my view, $MSTR is Daedalus, while $STRC is Icarus. In Greek mythology, Daedalus was a brilliant inventor who built wings of feathers and wax to escape imprisonment with his son, Icarus. Before taking flight, he warned Icarus not to fly too close to the sun. But intoxicated by the power of flight, Icarus ignored the warning. The wax melted, the wings failed, and he fell into the sea. To me, MSTR has always resembled Daedalus: an ingenious financial structure designed to accumulate Bitcoin through access to capital markets. Whether you love it or hate it, the logic was relatively straightforward: raise capital, buy BTC, and let Bitcoin's performance drive the outcome. STRC feels fundamentally different. I'm genuinely trying to understand the bull case, but I struggle to see how an instrument promising recurring cash distributions can remain sustainable when the underlying asset itself generates no cash flow. Bitcoin doesn't produce earnings, rents, coupons, or dividends. So the cash required to support STRC must ultimately come from financing activities, new issuance, or other capital market operations. The bullish argument, as I understand it, is that Strategy can continuously access capital at a cost that remains lower than the value created by its Bitcoin accumulation. If that assumption holds, the model may work for a very long time. But that seems to be the key assumption. What happens if BTC enters a multi-year sideways market? What happens if capital becomes more expensive? What happens if investor demand for these instruments weakens and higher yields are required to attract buyers? My concern isn't that BTC fails. My concern is that STRC introduces a layer of financial reflexivity that only remains stable as long as markets are willing to keep funding it on favorable terms. Maybe Saylor is seeing something that most of us don't. He's certainly been right more often than many of his critics. But while MSTR looked like a leveraged Bitcoin vehicle, STRC looks more like a structure whose sustainability depends on continued access to increasingly accommodating capital markets. That's the part I can't fully reconcile yet. What am I missing?