Honestly, why do many Web3 metrics look impressive but fail to reflect actual usage? The May image from @useTria caught my attention. Instead of just talking about “mass adoption”, they showed real usage signals: over 22 million transaction volumes, a surge in transaction volume and card spending activity at retailers. This wasn't explosive growth overnight, but rather a steady accumulation of real users. In your opinion, which metric is the most reliable for assessing the attractiveness of a project?
Share
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.