Crypto Hacking Protection and Regulation — You Can’t Have Both Looking at the various crypto hacking incidents, there’s a lot of talk about how AI advancements are accelerating hacks, and how such things can even happen — but the uncomfortable, precise solution is simply: “If you operate within a regulated framework and pay taxes, you’ll be granted legal protection.” Many of us complain that crypto securities regulation is bad, or that taxing DeFi is wrong — but on the flip side, when hacks occur, we’re left unprotected precisely because these activities fall outside regulation. 😭 Isn’t that why crypto regulation and taxation are often called a double-edged sword? If you want consistent protection against the countless hacks and outrageous events in crypto, then you should support regulation. Or, if you prefer crypto to remain free from regulation, then you must accept that you won’t receive legal protection. But as hacking incidents continue to multiply and accelerate, won’t the necessity of crypto regulation and taxation inevitably gain more support? Which do you prefer? 1. An environment where taxes and regulation are established, and your assets receive legal protection. 2. An environment with no taxes or regulation, allowing free asset accumulation — but with no legal protection whatsoever. #Crypto #Hacking #Regulation