Happy sunday Beldex fam, transparency is useful for verifying a blockchain, but dangerous when it turns every payment into a permanent identity trail. The more interesting idea behind @BeldexCoin is not simply hide the transaction. It is separating verification from identification. With ring signatures, a valid $BDX spend can be checked against a group of possible signers. The network confirms that one member authorized it, while an observer cannot determine which member was the actual sender. Linkability still helps prevent double spending, so privacy does not mean removing the rules. That is a better model for private infrastructure: Prove that an action is legitimate without forcing the person behind it into public view. Blockchains should not have to choose between verifiable activity and personal privacy. What information should always remain public onchain, and what should never become part of someones permanent profile?
riRoyal.Base.ethShare

Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.