Arc terminal does not need another impressive feature list. It needs a number users can feel. How many tabs disappeared? How many steps became one intent? How much time passed between a question and a result you could trust? That is the product benchmark I would watch for @TheARCTERMINAL. The architecture is ambitious, but ambition becomes adoption only when one repeated workflow is obviously faster than the old way. Not 10% better. Not merely more futuristic. So useful that returning to the previous process feels painful. The strongest AI operating systems will not win because they can technically do everything. They will win by compressing one difficult job, earning repeat use, then expanding from there. ARC terminals next unlock may be less about adding surface area and more about proving value density. One workflow. Fewer steps. A trusted result. Repeated until it becomes the default. What task should ARC make 10x faster first?