What would ACS help me catch that a basic trading filter would miss? The @agenticscredit docs describe a score combining profitability, drawdown, consistency and trading history. Bringing those signals together is useful. The stronger test is whether the combination improves selection. I’d compare an ACS-based shortlist with a simple rule using past profitability and drawdown. Both would select the same number of wallets from the same starting pool, then face the same evaluation period and risk limits. The comparison should include losses and returns after costs, with paper results kept separate. I haven’t verified a published test like that. It would help show where ACS adds value and where a simpler filter already does enough. That’s the evidence I’d find useful before relying on a score to allocate capital.