A profitable streak can look impressive, but it doesn't tell you whether a trader actually has a repeatable edge. That's why the scoring model behind @agenticscredit caught my attention. ACS looks at six signals: profitability, drawdown, consistency, longevity, win rate, and Sharpe. The detail I find most important is drawdown being the heaviest negative factor. Chasing a huge return while taking excessive risk isn't treated the same as producing returns while protecting capital. Consistency and longevity add another layer. One lucky run matters less when the system can look at how someone performs across a longer history. That feels much closer to how trading ability should be evaluated: not just how much you made, but how you got there.