60% vs 27%. that difference tells a story a liquidation count alone cannot. @zerufinance studied wallets liquidated on Aave and Morpho during June 2025. among the liquidated Aave wallets, 60% had withdrawn collateral before liquidation. on Morpho, it was just 27%. both groups reached a similar outcome, but their behavior leading up to it was different. Aave's affected users were more likely to adjust their positions, while Morpho's were largely passive. that doesn't prove collateral withdrawals caused every liquidation. it shows why timing and context matter. if a reputation model only records the final event, it misses how a wallet got there. two wallets can experience the same outcome for very different reasons. understanding those differences is what makes behavioral analysis useful beyond a simple risk score.
riRoyal.Base.ethShare

Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.
