Uniswap Founder Comments on Drift Attack: Centralized Projects Should Not Call Themselves DeFi

iconTechFlow
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
Uniswap founder Hayden Adams criticized the Drift Protocol exploit, calling out centralized projects for misusing the DeFi label. He stated that any project with an admin key is effectively CeFi, not DeFi. Adams noted that Uniswap has never had such a key. On-chain reports show the Drift attacker drained funds in 10 seconds using a signing key with full control. Chaos Labs founder Omer Goldberg confirmed that no timelocks or multisig protections were in place.

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams (@haydenzadams) commented on X regarding the Drift Protocol hack, stating that we must stop allowing centralized projects to call themselves DeFi. He noted that if an admin key can drain all funds, it is fundamentally CeFi—otherwise, the brand of DeFi becomes meaningless. He also emphasized that no version of Uniswap has an admin key capable of draining funds. Previously, Chaos Labs founder Omer Goldberg (@omeragoldberg) analyzed that Drift Protocol’s signing key held full control over market creation, oracle allocation, and withdrawal limits, with no time locks, multisignature, or delay mechanisms—the attacker drained funds in just 10 seconds.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.