UK man claims ex-wife stole 2,323 BTC via home surveillance, now worth $172M

iconChaincatcher
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
A UK High Court has permitted a case to proceed in which Ping Fai Yuen alleges his ex-wife stole 2,323 BTC using home surveillance in August 2023. The BTC, valued at $60 million at the time, is now worth $172 million as BTC continues to serve as a hedge against inflation. The funds were transferred to 71 non-custodial addresses and have remained inactive since December 2023. Yuen installed audio recording devices after his daughter expressed concerns. Li argued that BTC does not constitute physical property, but the court ruled the case may proceed under the Computer Misuse Act and other legal grounds.

ChainCatcher report: Last week, the UK High Court ruled that a lawsuit involving the theft of 2,323 bitcoins may proceed to trial. The plaintiff, Ping Fai Yuen, stated in court documents that his separated wife, Fun Yung Li, secretly obtained the recovery phrase for his Trezor hardware wallet in August 2023 using home surveillance cameras and transferred 2,323 bitcoins without authorization. At the time of the theft, the bitcoins were worth nearly $60 million; at the current price of approximately $74,000 each, their value is now around $172 million. Court documents show that the transferred bitcoins were dispersed across 71 non-exchange-held blockchain addresses through multiple transactions and have not been moved since December 21, 2023. Yuen claimed his daughter had warned Li about her attempt to steal the bitcoins, after which he installed recording devices at home. Following the discovery of the transfer, Yuen physically assaulted Li and pleaded guilty in 2024 to charges of actual bodily harm and two counts of common assault. Previously, Li had sought to dismiss the case, arguing that the plaintiff’s core claim of “conversion” applies only to tangible property and not to digital assets such as bitcoin. The judge agreed with this view but ruled that the case may proceed to trial based on other legal claims.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.