U.S. Senators Push for Easing Crypto Capital Rules for Banks

iconAMBCrypto
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
U.S. senators have called for a review of the 1,250% risk weight on crypto assets, labeling it a 'de facto blanket ban.' The letter, led by Republicans like Dan Sullivan and Cynthia Lummis, urges regulators to adjust capital gains tax implications and improve liquidity and crypto markets. They asked the Fed, FDIC, and OCC to align rules for tokenized securities with other digital assets.

U.S. senators have urged financial regulators to reconsider their strict capital rules for banks holding Bitcoin and other crypto assets.

The letter was signed by Republican senators, including Dan Sullivan, Cynthia Lummis, Bill Hagerty, Bernie Moreno, Ted Budd, and Jon Husted. The lawmakers said the current ‘1,250 risk weight’ on Bitcoin was ‘punitive.’

The Basel Committee on Bank Supervision published prudential capital standards for the on-balance sheet treatment of digital assets like bitcoin in 2022 and assigned a 1,250% risk weight—the most punitive classification in the capital framework.

AD
bank capital crypto
Source: X

This meant that for every $1 of crypto asset held by a bank, they should set aside $1.25 as an emergency reserve. For comparison, cash or Treasury bonds carry 0% risk weight because they are deemed ‘safe.’

Mortgages attract about 50% risk weight, meaning that BTC and crypto’s 1,250% weighting is the highest. For the Senators, this was like a ‘de facto blanket ban’ on banks that hold crypto assets.

This framework appears to be a blanket penalty assigned by asset category as a de facto ban on banks holding this asset class, in direct tension with a technology-neutral approach.

The lawmakers requested the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the OCC to apply a similar guideline on bank capital issued on tokenized stocks to other digital assets.

Will unlock crypto for more adoption?

Reacting to the update, Jeff Walton, the chief risk officer at Bitcoin treasury firm Strive, viewed the push as the potential final regulatory unlock. He said,

The most important final regulatory hurdle for Bitcoin is Basel risk weightings. If this changes, the door to rating agencies & institutional capital holding BTC gets kicked open.

Crypto assets, and BTC, in particular, have scored some regulatory wins in recent years.

From ETF wrappers to direct trading via banks and brokerages like JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley. There has also been a push to include them as alternative investments in retirement funds, 401(k)s, despite some opposition.

Perhaps the above Basel risk weighting reform and tax treatment could enhance further regulatory clarity and adoption.


Final Summary

  • Senate Republicans requested regulators to update the current 1,250% risk weighting on banks holding crypto and Bitcoin.
  • Analysts billed the push as the ‘final regulatory’ unlock for crypto’s inclusion in the financial system if the proposal is adopted.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.