U.S. Department of Commerce Withdraws Proposed AI Chip Export Rule

iconKuCoinFlash
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
On March 14, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce withdrew a proposed AI chip export regulation that had been under inter-agency review since late February. The AI Action Plan Implementation rule, listed for review on February 26, was subsequently removed. This action undermines the Trump administration’s effort to overhaul the Biden-era export policy enacted in January 2025. The rule reportedly would have tied approvals for over 200,000 chip exports to foreign investment or security assurances. A former official stated that the withdrawal likely reflects internal disagreements over global AI leadership and CFT concerns. Risk-on assets briefly rose but quickly reversed course.

BlockBeats news, on March 14, according to foreign media reports, government websites showed that the U.S. Department of Commerce withdrew a proposed rule regarding the export of artificial intelligence (AI) chips on Friday. The draft rule, which was intended to regulate global access to AI chips, had been sent to other agencies for comment at the end of February. The website did not specify the reason for the withdrawal. A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Commerce has not yet responded to requests for comment.


This withdrawal marks another setback for the Trump administration’s efforts to rescind and replace the AI chip export framework issued by the Biden administration in January 2025. The rule, titled the AI Action Plan Implementation, was posted on the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs website on February 26 with a status of “Under Review,” before being removed.


Documents show that the plan previously considered requiring foreign investment in or security assurances regarding U.S. data centers as a condition for approving exports of 200,000 or more chips. A former official said on Friday that the withdrawal of the latest proposed rules likely reflects internal disagreements within the government over how to achieve global AI leadership and address national security concerns. (Jin10)

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.