Tokenization Firms Disagree with Coinbase on Crypto Bill Impact

iconCoinDesk
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
Tokenization firms are pushing back on Coinbase’s claim that a stalled crypto bill would ban tokenized equity offerings. While CEO Brian Armstrong called it a “de facto ban,” industry leaders say the draft focuses on crypto compliance and regulatory clarity. Securitize’s Carlos Domingo called the bill a normal part of the legislative process. Superstate’s Alexander Zozos highlighted its role in addressing gray areas for non-security assets. Uniform Labs continues to advocate for regulated tokenized assets, with crypto industry news pointing to a potential trillion-dollar market by 2033.

A stalled crypto market structure bill and a high-profile pullback from Coinbase (COIN) aren’t slowing momentum for firms building around tokenized securities.

Hours after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the latest draft of the bill would amount to a “de facto ban” on tokenized equity offerings, the Senate Banking Committee canceled a scheduled markup session. A new date has yet to be scheduled.

But key representatives in the tokenization sector see a different picture than Coinbase's.

"The current draft does not kill tokenized equities," Carlos Domingo, CEO of Securitize told CoinDesk. It simply clarifies, he argued, that they’re still securities and must follow existing rules, a key step toward integrating blockchain into traditional markets.

He sees that the push-and-pull around the bill is a "typical and healthy" part of the legislative process.

"Market structure legislation of this significance takes time to get right, and what we’re seeing now is a bill that is actively taking shape," Domingo said. "We’re encouraged by the progress and hope the bill protects developers and innovation while maintaining market integrity."

Superstate, the asset management and tokenization firm led by Compound founder Robert Leshner, echoed that view. Its general counsel, Alexander Zozos, told CoinDesk the bill’s real value was in helping resolve gray areas for crypto assets that aren’t clearly securities, not in regulating tokenized stocks or bonds. That's under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's umbrella.

"The SEC is already on the case" Zozos said, citing the agency's "Project Crypto" initiative under Chairman Paul Atkins, and "will continue to provide that clarity even absent further legislative directives."

The real "loser" from the delay, he argued, is clarifying "regulatory turf" for projects seeking to raise capital and for tokenized assets that aren’t clearly securities.

Will Beeson, CEO of Uniform Labs, a blockchain protocol that enables institutions to swap between tokenized money market funds and stablecoins, said that "even without immediate legislative resolution, the push toward regulated, liquid tokenized assets continues."

"Institutions care less about headlines and more about whether tokenized securities can be moved, redeemed and reused seamlessly within financial workflows," Beeson said.

This push is part of a broader bet that tokenization could reshape global finance. Industryestimates suggest that tokenized versions of real-world assets — everything from funds, bonds, equities and other assets — could reach multiple trillions of dollars over the next decade. Wall Street giants such as BlackRock, Franklin Templeton and Fidelity have already launched or backed tokenized funds, seeing efficiency gains in settlement, liquidity and transparency as too significant to ignore.

That projected scale helps explain why tokenization firms are forging ahead regardless of the delay. Earlier Thursday, Citron Research argued that the reason Coinbase's opposition to the bill may not because it would harms investors, but because it could help licensed competitors.

"Legislation can influence the speed of the rollout," Superstate's Zozos said. “But it cannot change the direction of the tide.”

Read more: Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong says company opposed crypto bill to protect consumers

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.