PANews, March 15: According to Cointelegraph, Colin Butler, Executive Vice President of Capital Markets at Mega Matrix, stated that uncertainty surrounding the regulatory framework for stablecoins may place traditional banks at a greater disadvantage compared to crypto companies, as banks have already invested heavily in digital asset infrastructure but cannot fully implement related services until regulations become clearer. Additionally, the yield gap between stablecoin platforms and bank deposits may drive capital migration. Butler noted that most trading platforms offer yields of approximately 4% to 5% on stablecoin balances, while the average U.S. savings account yield remains below 0.5%; capital tends to flow rapidly toward higher-yielding opportunities. Butler also warned that if regulators restrict stablecoin yields, capital could shift toward less-regulated structures, such as synthetic dollar tokens like USDe that generate returns through derivatives strategies, thereby directing funds toward less transparent offshore markets. Fabian Dori, Chief Investment Officer at Sygnum, believes that although the competitive gap between banks and crypto platforms is widening, large-scale deposit outflows remain unlikely in the short term. However, he noted that once stablecoins are recognized as yield-generating digital cash, bank deposits will face significantly greater competitive pressure. Butler pointed out that bank legal departments currently struggle to justify further capital expenditures to their boards, as the market remains unclear on whether stablecoins will ultimately be classified as deposits, securities, or standalone payment instruments. Institutions such as JPMorgan Chase have developed the Onyx blockchain payment network, BNY Mellon has launched digital asset custody services, and Citigroup has tested tokenized deposits—but regulatory ambiguity limits the scalability of these investments. He added that, by contrast, crypto companies have long operated in regulatory gray areas and can continue expanding, whereas traditional banks cannot assume similar compliance risks, making them more vulnerable to losing ground in the stablecoin competition.
Stablecoin regulatory uncertainty may place traditional banks at a greater disadvantage than crypto firms.
PANewsShare
Summary
According to Colin Butler of Mega Matrix Capital Markets, regulatory uncertainty surrounding stablecoins could harm traditional banks more than crypto firms. Banks have developed digital asset infrastructure but lack clear guidelines to launch related services. Stablecoin platforms offer yields of 4–5%, while U.S. savings accounts remain below 0.5%. This disparity may redirect capital flows. Fabian Dori of Sygnum notes that large deposit outflows are unlikely in the near term, but banks could face pressure if stablecoins are perceived as yield-generating digital cash. The evolving landscape of crypto and digital asset news underscores the growing tension between traditional finance and decentralized alternatives.
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.