BlockBeats News, January 14: CZ responded."Meme Coin HAPPY-SCI Destroys $420,000 in Donations, Market Cap of $4 Million Nears Zero"Expresses understanding of the pain and sorrow felt by the community and the young P.
But there are always two sides to a story. Clarifications are as follows:
1. You cannot force yourself onto others. Everyone can try to approach others, but if others ignore you or respond in a way that is not what you expect, you must accept it. After all, it is you who approached them. In a decentralized world, you must always respect others' choices.
2. Everyone has their own thoughts. Not everyone wants their small charitable projects to be linked to a meme token (whose creator is unknown). This can indeed distort the nature of charitable projects. Is it really about charity, or is it helping P-boys become rich overnight? Do they themselves hold positions in these tokens? Is it truly charity, or are they wearing a wolf's head while selling dog meat? Even with explanations, it's hard to clarify. Maintaining integrity is more important.
3. Everyone's situation is different. In the companies or projects where I can offer advice, insider trading is strictly opposed. If there is any involvement with external projects, conflicts of interest become unclear, and in most cases, this would lead to termination. I believe everyone would 100% support this. However, the community wants employees to support their projects while also eliminating the possibility of insider trading. These two goals cannot coexist.
In addition, CZ reiterated that he is not very clear about the whole situation, but for Siyuan, the biggest reason might be number 2. Respect your own choices. Don't push all the responsibility onto others.