Coin Center Warns of Potential Regulatory Tightening if the CLARITY Act Fails

iconKuCoinFlash
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
Coin Center Executive Director Peter Van Valkenburgh warned that the failure of the CLARITY Act could lead to stricter regulatory policies under a future U.S. administration. The bill, which establishes a framework for digital asset regulation, token classification, and intermediary registration, has stalled in the Senate. Disagreements over provisions such as yield-generating stablecoins remain unresolved. Valkenburgh noted that without legislative clarity, developers of privacy tools could face heightened enforcement actions, potentially being treated as unregistered money transmitters. Since Gary Gensler’s departure in January 2025, the SEC has closed several enforcement cases and issued more lenient guidance.

Odaily Planet Daily reports that Peter Van Valkenburgh, Executive Director of Coin Center, stated that if the Crypto Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act) fails to pass, a future U.S. government unfriendly to the industry could once again intensify regulation of the crypto sector. If the developer protections outlined in the CLARITY Act and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act are rejected in favor of short-term commercial interests and the current regulatory environment, the industry could face adverse consequences.

Peter Van Valkenburgh stated that the purpose of the CLARITY Act is to legally bind future governments, rather than rely on the current administration’s stance; without such legal protections, the crypto industry could be subject to enforcement discretion, policy shifts, and uncertainty. According to him, the CLARITY Act has stalled in the Senate due to disagreements among banks, crypto companies, and lawmakers over key provisions, including whether stablecoin yields should be permitted. The bill covers frameworks for registering crypto intermediaries, regulation of digital assets, and token classification.

In addition, in the absence of legislative clarity, future administrations may intensify enforcement against developers of privacy tools, treating them as unregistered money transmitters, while existing regulatory guidance may also be rescinded. Previously, Gary Gensler, former chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, faced industry criticism for advancing policy through enforcement actions and settlements with crypto firms rather than formal rulemaking. Since his departure on January 20, 2025, the SEC has dismissed several long-standing enforcement cases against crypto companies and issued more lenient regulatory guidance. (Cointelegraph)

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.