Clarity Act May Grant XRP Equal Legal Status With Bitcoin and Ethereum

iconTheCryptoBasic
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
Bitcoin market news highlights a potential shift for XRP under the U.S. Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which may grant it the same legal status as Bitcoin and Ethereum. The bill classifies XRP as a 'network token' rather than a security, aligning it with Ethereum news developments. Digital assets supporting ETPs listed by January 1, 2026, would be non-securities. XRP already meets the criteria. The Senate Agriculture Committee has postponed its markup to maintain bipartisan support, with a new review set for late January.

Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett has pointed out a key provision in the draft of the U.S. Digital Asset Market Clarity Act that could place XRP in the same category as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

She explained in a post on X that lawmakers plan to treat certain digital assets as non-securities if they are already backed by an exchange-traded product (ETP) as of January 1, 2026.

Notably, the bill introduces a new label called “network tokens”. If a token is the main asset behind an ETP listed on a U.S. exchange by that date, it would not be considered a security and would therefore avoid additional disclosure requirements.

Under this proposal, Terrett said XRP would be legally treated the same as Bitcoin and Ethereum once the Clarity Act becomes law.

Key Points

  • The bill introduces “network tokens” as a distinct, non-security category.
  • Crypto assets backing nationally listed ETPs as of January 1, 2026, will automatically qualify for inclusion in this category.
  • XRP meets this requirement due to its existing ETF products, which gained approval last year.
  • The provision would allow U.S. regulators to treat XRP the same way as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Potential Implications for XRP

Notably, the provision reflects a market-driven regulatory approach. Rather than forcing regulators to assess decentralization levels or issuer control on a case-by-case basis, the bill relies on established financial infrastructure, specifically nationally listed ETPs, to determine which tokens qualify as non-securities.

This approach is especially significant for XRP. The token already underpins multiple ETPs that are listed and actively trading in the U.S., all of which secured approval well ahead of the January 1, 2026, deadline. Given XRP’s lengthy history of regulatory scrutiny, this development represents a meaningful shift in how U.S. law could ultimately treat the asset.

According to Eleanor Terrett, The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act would treat $XRP same as BTC and ETH. pic.twitter.com/5smWAyYo5S

— TheCryptoBasic (@thecryptobasic) January 13, 2026

A Long Road to Regulatory Recognition

XRP’s inclusion in the network-token category would mark a major milestone in its regulatory evolution. The token launched in 2012, during a period of minimal regulatory guidance, and operated alongside Bitcoin and other early cryptocurrencies.

However, in 2020, XRP became a central figure in U.S. crypto regulation after the SEC alleged it was an unregistered security in its lawsuit against Ripple. That pressure eased in July 2023, when a federal court ruled that XRP is not inherently a security.

Now, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act would cement XRP’s non-security status in law, grounding it in market-structure legislation beyond courtroom rulings. Ultimately, the bill would place XRP on equal legal footing with Bitcoin and Ethereum, which regulators consider to be commodities.

Present Status of the Clarity Act

Meanwhile, the Senate Agriculture Committee has postponed its planned markup of crypto market structure legislation, thereby avoiding what was shaping up to be a rare case of dueling markups in Congress.

According to a statement shared by Terrett, Committee Chairman John Boozman confirmed that the panel will now consider the legislation in the last week of January, rather than moving forward this Thursday alongside the Senate Banking Committee. He added that the delay is necessary to allow additional time to preserve bipartisan support for the bill.

DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.