The CFTC has rescinded its 1998 no-deny settlement policy under NS3, aligning with recent regulatory policy shifts. The move follows the SEC’s similar action in May 2026 and aims to ease legal pressure on firms facing enforcement actions. The CFTC also plans to vacate a $5 million settlement with Gemini, citing political bias. The change could speed up case resolutions and lower legal uncertainty, though market effects may vary by case.
Key Point The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission rescinded a policy that blocked lawsuit settlements when defendants denied the agency's allegations. The CFTC said the policy was first adopted in 1998 and may have created an incorrect impression that the Commission was trying to shield itself from criticism. Chairman Mike Selig said the Commission had refused for nearly three decades to settle cases unless defendants promised not to publicly deny the Commission's allegations. Crypto companies that faced CFTC or SEC enforcement actions have criticized the rule as a restriction on free speech. On Thursday, the CFTC sought to vacate its $5 million settlement with crypto exchange Gemini, and Selig claimed the case was politically targeted. Why it matters: The change may reduce settlement friction if defendants can resolve enforcement actions without accepting speech restrictions. ## Market Sentiment Cautiously Bullish, Regulatory-driven. Reason: The CFTC rescinded the no-deny settlement policy, which may make enforcement settlements more flexible for crypto companies. ## Similar Past Cases The SEC's rescission of Rule 202.5(e) in May ended a settlement condition that required defendants to agree not to publicly deny SEC allegations, and the SEC said the change would give the agency more flexibility in settling enforcement actions. (SEC) The difference is that the current CFTC move applies to commodities enforcement settlements rather than securities enforcement settlements. ## Ripple Effect Settlement policy is an enforcement channel, so easier settlement terms may reduce legal uncertainty for firms facing agency actions. If future settlements move faster under the revised policy, then market participants may treat enforcement overhangs as more containable. If agencies still demand admissions in specific cases, then the market impact may remain case-specific rather than sector-wide. ## Opportunities & Risks Opportunities: If future CFTC settlements proceed without no-deny terms, then faster case resolution can become a potential re-risking signal for directly affected crypto companies. Risks: If the CFTC requires admissions of facts or liabilities in specific settlements, then reducing exposure to directly involved assets can limit headline risk.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.
NS3
Summary