BTC Leveraged DCA: 3x Leverage Provides Low ROI Despite Increased Risk

iconBlockbeats
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
A five-year backtest shows that a BTC 3x leveraged DCA strategy yields only 3.5% more returns than a 2x leveraged strategy, but with significantly higher risk of total loss. The data suggests that a spot DCA strategy remains the best long-term approach. 2x leverage is the upper limit, while 3x underperforms due to volatility drag. Trading with higher leverage introduces structural drawdowns that hurt overall returns. Traders should carefully consider the risks before applying aggressive leverage in DCA setups.
Original Title: "Does Dollar-Cost Averaging in BTC with Leverage Really Make More Money?"
Original Author: CryptoPunk


A five-year backtest tells you: 3x leverage offers almost no cost-effectiveness.


Conclusion first:


In the backtest over the past five years, the final return of BTC with a triple leveraged regular investment was only 3.5% higher than that with a double leveraged investment, yet it came at the cost ofThe cost of risk approaching zero.


If we consider the risk, return, and feasibility comprehensively—Spot dollar-cost averaging is actually the optimal long-term solution; 2x is the extreme; 3x is not worth it.


Five-Year Regular Investment Net Value Curve: 3x Does Not "Create a Gap"




From the net asset value (NAV) trend, we can intuitively see that:


· Spot (1x):The curve smoothly rises with controllable drawdowns.


· 2x Leverage:Significantly increase returns during the bull market phase.


· 3x Leverage:Multiple instances of "crawling close to the ground," and long-term wear and tear from fluctuations.


Although in the rebound of 2025–2026, the 3x ultimately slightly outperformed the 2x,


ButFor years, the net asset value of 3x has consistently lagged behind that of 2x.


Note: In this backtest, the leverage part uses a daily rebalancing approach, which may result in volatility drag.


This means:


The ultimate success of 3x heavily relies on the "final stretch of the market movement."


II. Final Profit Comparison: The Marginal Returns of Leverage Decline Rapidly



The key is not "who benefits the most," but rather...How much extra is there?


· 1x → 2x:Earn an additional ≈ $23,700


· 2x → 3x:Just a bit more ≈ $2,300


The returns have almost stopped growing, but the risks are increasing exponentially.


III. Maximum Drawdown: 3X is Approaching "Structural Failure"



There is a very critical practical issue here:


· -50%:Mentally bearable


· -86%:Need +614% to break even


· -96%:Need +2400% to break even


3x leverage was essentially "mathematically bankrupt" during the 2022 bear market.


Subsequent profits have almost entirely come from new capital invested after the bottom of the bear market.


IV. Risk-Adjusted Returns: Cash Is Actually the Best



This set of data indicates three things:


1. The spot unit risk return is the highest.


2. The higher the leverage, the worse the "cost-effectiveness" of downside risk becomes.


3. 3x has been in a deep drawdown zone for a long time, causing immense psychological pressure.


The "Ulcer Index" is a technical indicator used in financial markets to measure the magnitude and duration of drawdowns in an investment or portfolio. It helps assess the emotional stress or "ulcer" that an investor might experience during a period of declining value. An Ulcer Index value of 0.51 indicates a relatively low level of drawdown risk or emotional stress. Here's a


The account has been "underwater" for a long time, giving you almost no positive feedback.


Why does the 3x leveraged product perform so poorly in the long term?


The reason is just one sentence:


"Daily Rebalancing + High Volatility = Continuous Loss"


In a volatile market:


· Rise → Add position


· Fall → Reduce position


· No rise or fall → The account continues to shrink


This is a typical example.Volatility Drag.


And its destructive power is related to the leverage multiple.squareProportional.


In high-volatility assets like BTC,


Using 3x leverage incurs a 9x volatility penalty.


Final conclusion: BTC itself is already a "high-risk asset."


The answer from this five-year backtest is very clear:


· Spot Market Regular Investment:The risk-return ratio is optimal, and it can be implemented in the long term.


· 2x Leverage:Radical upper limit, suitable only for a few people


· 3x Leverage:Long-term cost-effectiveness is very low, making it unsuitable as a regular investment tool.


If you believe in the long-term value of BTC,


Therefore, the most rational choice is often not "adding another layer of leverage,"


But ratherLet time be on your side, not your enemy.


Original article link


Click to learn about BlockBeats' job openings.


Welcome to join the official Lulin BlockBeats community:

Telegram Subscription Group:https://t.me/theblockbeats

Telegram discussion group:https://t.me/BlockBeats_App

Official Twitter account:https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.