Blockstream's Adam Back Proposes Optional Quantum Safeguards for Bitcoin

iconCrypto Economy
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
Bitcoin breaking news: Blockstream CEO Adam Back proposed optional quantum-resistance upgrades for Bitcoin at Paris Blockchain Week. His plan contrasts with BIP-361, which would freeze coins at risk of quantum attacks. Google Quantum AI recently showed quantum computers could break Bitcoin’s cryptography using far fewer qubits than expected. Around 6.9 million BTC, including early coins, are now in question. Bitcoin news outlets are closely tracking the debate.

TL;DR:

  • Adam Back proposed optional quantum-resistance upgrades for Bitcoin, in contrast to BIP-361, which calls for a forced freeze of vulnerable coins.
  • Google Quantum AI published research showing that quantum computers could break Bitcoin’s cryptography with 20 times fewer physical qubits.
  • Around 6.9 million BTC are vulnerable to quantum attack, including coins attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto.

Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, presented at Paris Blockchain Week a proposal for optional quantum-resistance upgrades for Bitcoin, in direct opposition to BIP-361, an initiative that contemplates mandatorily freezing coins considered vulnerable to this technological threat.

“Preparation is key. Making changes in a controlled manner is much safer than reacting to a crisis,” Back declared during the event. Back also highlighted the emergency coordination capacity that the Bitcoin network has demonstrated throughout its history: “Bugs have been identified and fixed within hours. When something becomes urgent, attention grows and consensus follows.”

Computacion cuantica bitcoin

The Quantum Threat Divides Bitcoin Developers

Back’s stance contrasts with BIP-361, a proposal drafted by Jameson Lopp and five other developers, updated on April 15 in the official Bitcoin repository under the title “Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset“. This scheme proposes a staged soft hard fork that, in its final phase, would freeze coins that fail to migrateto addresses resistant to quantum computing, including funds attributed to Bitcoin’s anonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.

The debate erupted following the publication of new research by Google Quantum AI last month. According to that work, a superconducting qubit system would need fewer than 500,000 physical qubits to break Bitcoin’s elliptic curve cryptography in a matter of minutes, a reduction of 20 times compared to previous estimates. Researchers calculate that approximately 6.9 million BTC are exposed to this vulnerability, of which around 1.7 million correspond to mining rewards from the Satoshi era.

Charles Edwards dijo que las amenazas cuánticas son reales y urgentes en 2026, pero no deberían ser el motor de un BTC en $60,000.

Canary Funds and Other Alternatives

BitMEX Research published yesterday an alternative approach proposing the creation of a “Canary Fund” composed of coins vulnerable to quantum attack. The idea is that a full freezewould only be triggered if a spend is detected from that address, functioning as an early warning signal. Other researchers are exploring the possibility of implementing quantum-resistant transactions without the need for a network fork. Outside the Bitcoin ecosystem, networks such as Ethereum, Solana, and Naoris Protocol are also working on quantum-resistance solutions, making “Q-Day” a cross-cutting concern for the entire crypto industry.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.