TL;DR:
- The project sets its deadline at block 961,632 to activate the temporary data restriction on the network.
- Mining pools record a signaling level of 0.86% compared to the required 55% threshold.
- Blockstream CEO Adam Back rejected the proposal, stating that it violates technical consensus.
The BIP-110 upgrade proposal has entered its final three-week countdown before reaching block 961,632 on the Bitcoin network. The initiative seeks to restrict Ordinals-type inscriptions through a user-activated soft fork. However, Blockstream CEO Adam Back criticized its proponents, pointing out that the measure lacks technical and ideological support.
i do think the bipcoiners are bitcoiners, they're just misled, don't know how bitcoin works, nor bitcoin IETF-like process works; and sadly some of them are going to get disillusioned in a few weeks when 110 forks off and stalls.
— Adam Back (@adam3us) July 20, 2026
Debate on Neutrality and Consensus in Bitcoin
The proposal’s code provides for a one-year freeze on non-monetary transactions. Official project information indicates that validating nodes running this change will begin rejecting blocks that do not signal explicit support once the designated block height is reached.
For his part, the analysis revealed by Adam Back contends that supporters are attempting to enforce rules without reaching a broad consensus within the ecosystem. According to the Blockstream executive, initiatives to filter data represent a mechanism of subjective censorship that contradicts network neutrality.
In this context, industry figures such as Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, expressed opposition to the measure. According to crypto market reports, Saylor argues that transaction fees should be freely determined by block space supply and demand.
Miner Participation and Technical Perspective
On-chain statistics show that current signaling from mining pools stands at 0.86% as of press time. To achieve activation under the rules set by the proposal, network data indicates that at least 55% of the total hash rate is required.
The gap between the set goal and recorded support reflects scarce adoption by infrastructure operators. According to market analyst estimates, there is also no liquidity or futures contracts associated with this fork.
On the other hand, Adam Back noted that the fork attempt is heading toward a low-processing scenario. In his public statements, the executive explained that the lack of computing power on the modified branch will prevent the sustained production of valid blocks.
The process will reach a decisive stage when the network reaches block 961,632 in the coming three weeks. At that moment, the behavior of modified nodes and the technical viability of the resulting chain will be verified.