AI Models Discover Counterexamples to Long-Standing Mathematical Conjectures

iconKuCoinFlash
Share
AI summary iconSummary
Long-term investment strategies may require reassessment as AI models such as Claude Fable and Codex have identified counterexamples to the Jacobian conjecture. Mathematicians Levent Alpöge and Aaron Lou used these tools to generate three-dimensional polynomial mappings, disproving the 1939 conjecture. The risk-to-reward profile of AI-driven discoveries remains uncertain, with potential implications for cryptography and scientific research.
ME AI News: According to monitoring by Beating, Anthropic mathematician Levent Alpöge used Claude Fable to find a three-dimensional counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture. This problem, unresolved since 1939, is listed among the important mathematical challenges of the 21st century. The polynomial mapping provided by Fable has a Jacobian determinant constantly equal to −2, yet maps three distinct inputs to the same output, proving it cannot be invertible—thus falsifying the three-dimensional and higher-dimensional versions, while the two-dimensional case remains unsolved. Subsequently, OpenAI researcher Aaron Lou asked the internal Codex model to independently attempt the same task. Without internet access, the model also discovered an essentially identical counterexample and derived the reasoning process. In the future, mathematicians may simultaneously submit numerous open problems to different models. AI can iteratively test hypotheses to find counterexamples, vulnerabilities, and new insights, then verify results using symbolic computation or formal proof tools. Many directions previously too time-consuming to exhaustively explore may now be rapidly surveyed, potentially accelerating scientific discovery. However, problems will not automatically become simpler. Models will also generate batches of seemingly rigorous but incorrect proofs, shifting the academic challenge from “unable to find answers” to “unable to verify answers in time.” The greater risk lies in genuine breakthroughs: RSA security relies on the difficulty of factoring large integers; Diffie-Hellman and elliptic curve cryptography depend on the hardness of solving discrete logarithms. If AI discovers a sufficiently fast new algorithm, parts of public-key systems used in website encryption, digital signatures, banking transactions, and blockchains could become invalid, forcing a global emergency overhaul of cryptographic standards. (Source: BlockBeats)
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.