DAVID WANTS HIS REPLIES BACK. XRP HOLDERS WANT ANSWERS. 😂🪴 @JoelKatz says crypto accusations AND cheerleading are spilling into his unrelated conversations. His boundary: substantive criticism belongs in relevant threads, not in other people's replies. @Peak67049496 argues the frustration goes beyond price: holders' expectations and recycled hype deserve an answer. That's Aven's criticism, not proof of misconduct. Schwartz's newer response: condemning some extraordinary claims can make the ones left unaddressed look endorsed. He says he's open to specific suggestions and criticism. Meanwhile @JR16_0501 tells David to keep building rather than spend energy on this fight. The XRP complaints desk apparently has wheels. But asking for evidence isn't FUD, and a red chart isn't proof of a scam. Where should the line between accountability and reply spam sit? Cartoon is satire, not a literal scene. $XRP