Why are these neurons being entrusted with pivotal votes? That is the question the community should be asking. On major proposals like 141137 and 141132, governance influence should be in the hands of people with real conviction, real alignment, and real skin in the game.Instead, some followers are still handing voting power to neurons with extremely small ICP positions. Proposal References: 141137 and 141132 Neurons and Staked ICP Name Staked ICP Krzysztof 2,905.77289631 ICP ysyms 2,778 ICP NeuronPool 93.00729635 ICP Anvil 26.56708365 ICP Taggr Network 1.20509128 ICP Rakeoff. io 1 ICP Nicolas.ic 1 ICP Some of these have slightly meaningful stake. Some clearly do not. So why are neurons with 1 ICP or 1.20509128 ICP being trusted, followed, and given relevance on decisions that can affect infrastructure, growth, and network direction? Why is borrowed influence being treated as credible authority? Why are people not checking who they are following before handing over governance weight? Pivotal votes should not be shaped by blind trust. They should be shaped by informed judgment, transparent reasoning, and aligned economic exposure.If a neuron has almost no capital at risk, the community should be asking why it is being entrusted with serious influence at all. That is not a personal attack. That is a governance accountability issue. $ICP #ICP #DFINITY