Three projects were reviewed and I wrote my own comments about the project below. I tried to test it thoroughly and give my honest opinion about the projects. 1. The site was pretty basic and the UI hadn't been worked on, and the next thing was that the up, down, left, and right buttons were in a really bad place for people who wanted to play on their phones. And the next issue is that I think it's not very compatible with the GenLayer project https://t.co/NazA5DrXGK https://t.co/gGvmc7Z3gg 2. Connecting the MetaMask wallet isn't working—whether due to subdomain issues or other factors—which makes users apprehensive about attempting the connection. One point that I believe needs addressing is this: according to the project's own documentation, the "evidence" isn't actually fetched or verified; the validator simply makes a judgment based on the contributor's written explanation. This means that, in its current state, the system is vulnerable to a fabricated yet convincing explanation. Furthermore, resolving disputes rests entirely with the owner, with no other checks-and-balances mechanism in place. https://t.co/91gsP1dpOO https://t.co/BNGaV1A3jT 3. Overall, the concept and user experience (UX) are good, but the sanitization layer for external content needs to be strengthened before submission to the validator. https://t.co/uLRJJ4jMMB @GenLayer