Unpopular opinion: convenience is not always an improvement. Some friction protects us from decisions we would not make with ten more seconds to think. One-click purchases remove the moment when desire has to survive reflection. Instant replies reward speed even when the conversation deserves care. Autoplay keeps choosing for us after we have stopped choosing for ourselves. Good friction is not pointless bureaucracy. It is a deliberate pause placed between impulse and consequence. Technology should remove the steps that waste our time, but preserve the ones that help us exercise judgment. A product that makes every action effortless may also make intention unnecessary. The better design question is not “How many clicks can we eliminate?” It is “Which clicks are doing useful psychological work?” What is one inconvenience you would keep because it helps you make better decisions?
KIEZENShare
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.